Reviews and Endorsements for Resolving Aaron's Social Insurance Paradox (v1)

Method used to verify the authenticity of this review

Please rate your impartiality with regard to this paper.

Scoring:
1 - I have a very close connection to the author.
2 - I have a close connection to the author.
3 - I have a moderate connection to the author.
4 - I have a distant connection to the author.
5 - I have no connection to the author.

Please rate your academic credentials in economics.

Scoring:
1 - No formal knowledge in economics
2 - Taken a university course in economics
3 - University degree in economics
4 - PhD degree in economics
5 - Professor of economics

Please rate your academic credentials in mathematics.

Scoring:
1 - No formal knowledge in mathematics
2 - Taken a university course in mathematics
3 - University degree in mathematics
4 - PhD degree in mathematics
5 - Professor of mathematics

Please rate your experience with pension systems based on your academic and professional work.

Scoring:
1 - No experience with pension systems
2 - Basic knowledge through courses or self-study
3 - Published or contributed to a pension-related work
4 - Published multiple pension-related works
5 - Major research focus (e.g., editor, policy advisor)

Please indicate how much time you invested in reviewing this paper.

Scoring:
1 - Very brief review (less than 30 minutes)
2 - Brief review (30-60 minutes)
3 - Moderate review (1-2 hours)
4 - Thorough review (2-4 hours)
5 - Exhaustive review (4+ hours)

Please rate how well you understood the paper.

Scoring:
1 - Minimal understanding of the paper
2 - Partial understanding of the main concepts
3 - Good understanding with some areas of uncertainty
4 - Thorough understanding with minor gaps
5 - Complete comprehension of all aspects

Please indicate whether you believe the paper is worth reading.

Scoring:
1 - Not at all
2 - Probably not
3 - Maybe
4 - Recommended
5 - Definitely